Your integrity in publishing the Brooke Pinto retraction, and sharing the care with which the initial story was researched, investigated and written, is refreshing. It confirms my confidence in subscribing to SpyTalk. I look forward to following your future critical, analytical exploration of worldwide intelligence issues.
So no one ever commented then some lawyers called and gave some vague language that still isn’t clear he resigned, and no one has seen a resignation letter? This sounds like a comment to add to the story, but not a full retraction. Sounds like Pinto’s paid guns are out bullying people.
Thank you very much for this update and full explanation. This is the professional and correct thing to do.
Your integrity in publishing the Brooke Pinto retraction, and sharing the care with which the initial story was researched, investigated and written, is refreshing. It confirms my confidence in subscribing to SpyTalk. I look forward to following your future critical, analytical exploration of worldwide intelligence issues.
So no one ever commented then some lawyers called and gave some vague language that still isn’t clear he resigned, and no one has seen a resignation letter? This sounds like a comment to add to the story, but not a full retraction. Sounds like Pinto’s paid guns are out bullying people.